April 25, 2024 article from El País.
A London librarian has analyzed millions of articles in search of uncommon terms abused by artificial intelligence programs. He detected a sudden rise in the use of certain words, such as meticulously (up 137%), intricate (117%), commendable (83%) and meticulous (59%.)
“Andrew Gray estimates that at least 60,000 scientific studies (more than 1% of those analyzed in 2023) were written with the help of ChatGPT — a tool launched at the end of 2022 — or similar. ‘I think extreme cases of someone writing an entire study with ChatGPT are rare,’ says Gray, a 41-year-old Scottish librarian. In his opinion, in most cases artificial intelligence is used appropriately to ‘polish’ the text — identify typos or facilitate translation into English — but there is a large gray area, in which some scientists take the assistance of ChatGPT even further, without verifying the results. ‘Right now it is impossible to know how big this gray area is, because scientific journals do not require authors to declare the use of ChatGPT, there is very little transparency,’ he laments.”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
Paradigm Shifts, Entrenched Thinking, and the Future of Medicine
A new paper proposes a single ratio, read off a fingerprick, that tells you where your metabolism is headed. It started in a cancer clinic. Its authors think it belongs in every MetFix affiliate.
Mark Sisson separates longevity fads from the habits that consistently improve health and performance
