Doctors sue British tabloid for libel and win first battle round
The case shines a light on how journalists cover scientific issues and how the media seeks to discredit those who challenge the official narrative.
The case shines a light on how journalists cover scientific issues and how the media seeks to discredit those who challenge the official narrative.
Headlines following observational study following red meat consumption confuses correlation with causation.
Over the years there have been many risk calculators for cardiovascular disease. Which of them works best? The answer is… none of them.
Anton Garret argues that Bayesian methods, which incorporate prior information and logical consistency, offer a more robust framework for dealing with uncertainty compared to frequentist methods.
If we can’t trust study results, and we can’t repeat studies, where do we stand?
Bob Kaplan gives a background of the MMT theory of cancer explains the importance of Thomas Seyfried’s latest work.
Inside the Fight Against Broken Science Led by The Medical Society
Lessons Learned from CrossFit and Applied by The Medical Society
Malcolm explains how trials become unblinded, either officially or through indicators in biomarkers.
Malcolm elaborates on the power to manipulate studies when placebos are not benign.