Non-communicable disease risk associated with red and processed meat consumption—magnitude, certainty, and contextuality of risk?
While some research claims eating red meat and processed meat can be harmful, the evidence does not support this. Any harm is generally reported as relative risk, with little to no change in absolute risk. Also, the harms of eating meat tend not to be causal, with all negative associations disappearing when meat is consumed as part of a healthy diet.
April 2023 article from Animal Frontiers:
And,
Over 1,100 scientists have signed ‘The Dublin Declaration of Scientists on the Societal Role of Livestock,’ a written statement outlining the importance honest, diligent, and unbiased research concerning the role of livestock in the world’s nutritional needs, human health, the environment, socio-economics, and the future of human civilization.
Meanwhile,
Some Cities Want to Ban Meat, Dairy, Private Vehicles
“Fourteen major American cities are part of a globalist climate organization known as the ‘C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group,’ which has an ‘ambitious target’ by the year 2030 of ‘0 kg [of] meat consumption,’ ‘0 kg [of] dairy consumption,’ ‘3 new clothing items per person per year,’ ‘0 private vehicles’ owned, and ‘1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person.’”
August 22, 2023 article from The John Locke Foundation.
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
In 2015 WHO said yes, but insiders say the process was flawed and biased
Where’s the Controversy? The Science of Optimum Health is largely Settled
