Howson critiques classical statistical methods and defends Bayesianism as a coherent framework for inductive reasoning.
“To possess a demonstrably sound inductive logic, one whose pronouncements are both non-empty and avoid the force of Hume’s powerful sceptical arguments, is a great intellectual achievement, on a par in significance with the contemporary development of formal deductive logic…”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
And more evidence that victory isn’t defined by survival or quality of life
The brain is built on fat—so why are we afraid to eat it?
Q&A session with MetFix Head of Education Pete Shaw and Academy staff Karl Steadman
