Howson critiques classical statistical methods and defends Bayesianism as a coherent framework for inductive reasoning.
“To possess a demonstrably sound inductive logic, one whose pronouncements are both non-empty and avoid the force of Hume’s powerful sceptical arguments, is a great intellectual achievement, on a par in significance with the contemporary development of formal deductive logic…”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
Flawed scientific thinking lies at the heart of postmodern scientific, medical, and institutional failures
Dr. Drew traces the roots of modern misinformation to scientific illiteracy and a growing intolerance for uncertainty, debate, and dissent.
How Broken Science Built the Chronic Disease Epidemic—and Why Education Is the Way Out
