Howson critiques classical statistical methods and defends Bayesianism as a coherent framework for inductive reasoning.
“To possess a demonstrably sound inductive logic, one whose pronouncements are both non-empty and avoid the force of Hume’s powerful sceptical arguments, is a great intellectual achievement, on a par in significance with the contemporary development of formal deductive logic…”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
Inside Dave Feldman’s KetoCa study and the questions surrounding its data, analysis, and quality control
Paradigm Shifts, Entrenched Thinking, and the Future of Medicine
A new paper proposes a single ratio, read off a fingerprick, that tells you where your metabolism is headed. It started in a cancer clinic. Its authors think it belongs in every MetFix affiliate.
