Howson critiques classical statistical methods and defends Bayesianism as a coherent framework for inductive reasoning.
“To possess a demonstrably sound inductive logic, one whose pronouncements are both non-empty and avoid the force of Hume’s powerful sceptical arguments, is a great intellectual achievement, on a par in significance with the contemporary development of formal deductive logic…”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
What this increasingly popular cholesterol marker measures—and why its meaning depends on metabolic context
How the stuff that keeps your salad dressing from separating may be quietly remodeling your gut
Member showcase with Dr. Luke Palmisano
