December 3, 2024 article from Science.
By using the names of real scientists but providing fake email addresses, nearly 22 papers were found to contain fake peer reviews.
Elsevier has since retracted the papers, as the Editors-in-Chief have lost confidence in the validity of the articles.
“All 22 of the STOTEN retraction notices say the reviewers’ names and fictitious contact details had been submitted by ecotoxicologist Guilherme Malafaia of the Goiano Federal Institute in Brazil, who was a corresponding author on 21 of the papers and a co-author on one.”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
A new paper proposes a single ratio, read off a fingerprick, that tells you where your metabolism is headed. It started in a cancer clinic. Its authors think it belongs in every MetFix affiliate.
Mark Sisson separates longevity fads from the habits that consistently improve health and performance
Flawed scientific thinking lies at the heart of postmodern scientific, medical, and institutional failures
