Category: Scientific Misconduct
Category: Scientific Misconduct
Families pay thousands of dollars to store their children’s stem cells with the hope of a healthier future. But the cells are rarely useful, and sometimes contaminated.
Headlines following observational study following red meat consumption confuses correlation with causation.
Over the years there have been many risk calculators for cardiovascular disease. Which of them works best? The answer is… none of them.
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick and Zoë Harcombe PhD received a judgement in their favor yesterday in a London court. Kendrick and Harbombe had filed a libel suit against Associated Newspapers and a journalist who published defamatory articles about them due to their position on the effectiveness of statins.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with the Biden administration in a dispute with Republican-led states over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social media posts on topics including COVID-19 and election security.
The founders of Retraction Watch, an organization specialized in research misconduct, call for eliminating the incentives to manipulate metrics.
If we can't trust study results, and we can't repeat studies, where do we stand?
The American Diabetes Association takes millions from companies that stand to profit from our reliance on drugs. Is that affecting their guidance?
Bob Kaplan gives a background of the MMT theory of cancer explains the importance of Thomas Seyfried's latest work.
By Bob Kaplan