Howson critiques classical statistical methods and defends Bayesianism as a coherent framework for inductive reasoning.
“To possess a demonstrably sound inductive logic, one whose pronouncements are both non-empty and avoid the force of Hume’s powerful sceptical arguments, is a great intellectual achievement, on a par in significance with the contemporary development of formal deductive logic…”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
What barbell exercise is the most important for the aged?
Colin Howson argues that Bayesian probability provides a rational solution to the problem of induction by treating probabilities as logical degrees of belief updated with evidence.
