BSI’s Emily Kaplan explains the difference between absolute risk and relative risk, using a fictitious example to illustrate how results can be made to sound profound, when they really aren’t.

Despite recent scandals of research misconduct and error, the academic world still seems determined to look the other way.

“I learnt very early on in my career that you cannot slice data the way they did.” says John Mandrola, a cardiac electrophysiologist.

Publish or perish, the null ritual, improper incentives, the inference revolution, illusions of certainty, statistical power… Gerd Gigerenzer looks back at trends in science to [...]

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent approval of new Alzheimer’s drugs sparked a flicker of hope for the millions affected by this devastating disease. But this progress [...]

A neuroscience image sleuth finds signs of fabrication in scores of Alzheimer’s articles, threatening a reigning theory of the disease

Former editor of The BMJ says, “It’s interesting to me in a way that journals are still alive, because I think there’s a lot of [...]

BSI Founder Greg Glassman addresses a crowd at a CrossFit affiliate gym in 2022.

Originally recorded in 2017 by BSI co-founder Greg Glassman, this talk hones in on a critical issue that BSI considers a major breaking point in scientific integrity: the "Replication Crisis."