December 13, 2022 article from Experimental History.
Why the greatest scientific experiment in history failed, and why that’s a great thing.
Adam Mastroianni of Experimental History explains the history and downfall of the peer review process.
“Peer review was a huge, expensive intervention. By one estimate, scientists collectively spend 15,000 years reviewing papers every year. It can take months or years for a paper to wind its way through the review system, which is a big chunk of time when people are trying to do things like cure cancer and stop climate change. And universities fork over millions for access to peer-reviewed journals, even though much of the research is taxpayer-funded, and none of that money goes to the authors or the reviewers.”
Let's start with the truth!
Support the Broken Science Initiative.
Subscribe today →
recent posts
A new paper proposes a single ratio, read off a fingerprick, that tells you where your metabolism is headed. It started in a cancer clinic. Its authors think it belongs in every MetFix affiliate.
Mark Sisson separates longevity fads from the habits that consistently improve health and performance
Flawed scientific thinking lies at the heart of postmodern scientific, medical, and institutional failures
